Legal Opinion

O'Meara v. Haiden

California Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1928No. Docket No. S.F. 11952PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

Action for damages for death of plaintiff’s son from injuries sustained by reason of the negligent operation of an automobile by appellant.

On the 14th of September, 1922, Herbert O’Meara, plaintiff’s son, then the age of seven years, while running across Bast 12th Street in the city of Oakland, was struck by an automobile driven by defendant B. Henderson, the agent of the defendant, G. P. Haiden. As a result of his injuries he remained in bed two weeks. He returned to school in November and attended irregularly for some five months. On November 1, 1922, the plaintiff in consideration of the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bliss v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Lumley v. Wabash R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  4. Mullen v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  5. Garcia v. California Truck Co.California Supreme Court · 1920

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. CarreraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Westberg v. WilldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Casey v. ProctorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API