Legal Opinion

Beeson v. Green Mountain Gold Mining Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 6,847PublishedCited by 71 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, in the Second District Court, County of Plumas. Clough, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.

This is an action brought under § 377 of the Code of Civil Procedure, by the widow of one George Beeson deceased, to recover damages for negligently causing the death of deceased. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $8,000 damages. Upon the trial, when plaintiff rested her case, defendant moved for a nonsuit, which was denied. As the questions in*27volved in the motion are similar to those involved in the instructions given and refused, we consider them together.

The defendant, a corporation, was engaged in quartz-mining in Plumas County, its principal place of business being in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flike v. . Boston and Albany R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. WelchIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Noyes v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1855
  4. Brothers v. CartterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  5. Wright v. New York Central Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Bell v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Harrison v. Sutter Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Munro v. Pacific Coast Dredging & Reclamation Co.California Supreme Court · 1890

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API