Marks v. Reissinger
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Yuba, and from an order refusing a new trial. Eugene P. McDaniel, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The action was brought by plaintiff as administratrix of the estate of her husband, on .behalf of herself and her three minor children, to recover damages for the death of her husband, alleged to have been caused by blows wrongfully inflicted upon him by defendant. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff in the sum of ten thousand dollars, and judgment was entered accordingly. The appeal is by defendant from said judgment and from an order denying him a new trial.
Briefly, the facts of the ease may be stated as follows: Harry Marks, the deceased, was the owner of a number of work…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Munro v. Pacific Coast Dredging & Reclamation Co.California Supreme Court · 1890
- Driscoll v. Market Street Cable RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Earley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Clopton v. CloptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Burk v. Arcata & Mad River RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Kaplan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Larcher v. WanlessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Deevy v. TassiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Madison v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Gett v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.