Legal Opinion

Ross v. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal Railways Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1920No. Civ. No. 3244PublishedCited by 29 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. Joseph S. Koford, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.

This is an action against the defendant street railway company, and its motorman, S. Serpicó, for damages resulting from the death of plaintiff’s minor son, Andrew Ross.

It is charged in the complaint that at the time he was killed, Andrew Ross, a hoy of the age of sixteen years, was walking across Telegraph Avenue, in the city of Berkeley, when a street-car of the defendant company, operated by Serpico at a high, excessive, and careless rate of speed, ran over him, causing his death. It is alleged in a second count that at the time of the accident the motorman so operated the street-car as to…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. GentrySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Baltimore & Potomac R. Co. v. LandriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. DeselmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Scott v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Puckhaber v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1901

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Gorman v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Gilmore v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Wright v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Duehren v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Thor v. BoskaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API