Legal Opinion

Dyas v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1903No. S.F. No. 2774PublishedCited by 47 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

Plaintiffs, the widow and minor child of Joseph Dyas, deceased, brought this action against the defendant to recover damages for his death, claimed to have been occasioned through the negligence of defendant in furnishing insecure and unsafe appliances to the deceased, its employee, while engaged in its service. The case was tried before a jury, a verdict rendered for the plaintiffs for six thousand dollars, and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial it appeals.

The principal facts in the case are that the deceased, on. October 26, 1896, was operating a derrick at one of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Harrison v. Sutter Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Beeson v. Green Mountain Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Callan v. BullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Morgan v. Southern Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Henry v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Hale v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Daggett v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Crabbe v. Mammoth Channel Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Mize v. Rocky Mountain Bell Telephone Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Gorman v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API