Legal Opinion

Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Jennings

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 2011No. 92AP3208-DPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review the recommendation of Referee Christine Harris Taylor to deny David V Jennings Ill's petition for reinstatement of his license to practice law in Wisconsin. While finding that Attorney Jennings' employment history during the term of his license revocation has been exemplary and that he has maintained competence and learning in the law, the referee concluded, nevertheless, that Attorney Jennings failed to satisfy by clear, satisfactory, and convincing evidence all of the reinstatement standards. See SCR 22.29(4) and (4m).1

*338¶ 2. Referee Taylor questioned Attorney Jennings' moral…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Proceedings Against GralWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. PolichWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. JenningsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against GilbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Matter of Disc. Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael D. MandelmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John J. BalistrieriWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mandelman (In Re Mandelman)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. WoodardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Walter W. Stern, IIIWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API