Legal Opinion

Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Woodard

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 2012No. 1993AP1135-D, 1994AP1838-D & 1996AP884-DPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review the report and recommendation of the referee, Lisa C. Goldman, that the license of Attorney Stanley V. Woodard to practice law in Wisconsin should be reinstated with certain specified conditions.1 After fully reviewing this matter, we agree with the referee that Attorney Woodard's license should be reinstated and that conditions should be placed upon his practice of law in this state. We conclude, however, that the referee's suggested conditions on Attorney Woodard's return to the practice of law must be strengthened and clarified. We also determine that Attorney Woodard should…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. JenningsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Disciplinary Proceedings Against GralWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. SchlieveWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WoodardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against WoodwardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John J. BalistrieriWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel ParksWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel ParksWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel ParksWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API