Legal Opinion
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mandelman (In Re Mandelman)
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided May 24, 2018No. 2003AP003348-DPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
*630¶ 1 We review, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.33(3),1 a report filed by Referee James W. Mohr, Jr., recommending the court reinstate the license of Attorney Michael D. Mandelman to practice law in Wisconsin, with conditions. The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) did not appeal the referee's recommendation. After fully reviewing this matter, we conclude that Attorney Mandelman has not satisfied the criteria required to resume the practice of law in this state, and we deny his petition for reinstatement. We also determine that Attorney Mandelman should be required to pay the costs of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lathrop v. DonohueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. JenningsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against GralWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against MandelmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against MandelmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Elvis C. BanksWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James M. SchoeneckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mandelman (In Re Mandelman)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael D. MandelmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael D. MandelmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.