Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Polich
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Per curiam
¶ 1. We review the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations of Referee *268Cheryl Rosen Weston for sanctions, pursuant to SCR 22.17(2).1 Attorney Steve J. Polich was found to have engaged in unprofessional conduct in the course of his practice of law in violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct. The referee recommended a public reprimand and payment of an unspecified proration of the costs.
¶ 2. We approve the findings, conclusions and recommendations, and determine that Attorney Polich's misconduct warrants a public reprimand. However, we disagree with the recommendation for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CharltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against NorlinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against PangmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against PreloznikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against InglimoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. JenningsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against NunneryWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Parks (In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Daniel Parks)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Margaret BachWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.