Legal Opinion
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Walter W. Stern, III
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 4, 2016No. 2013AP000149-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
¶ 1 We review, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.33(3), 1 a report filed by Referee Dennis J. Flynn, recommending that the court reinstate the license of Walter W. Stern, III to practice law in Wisconsin. Upon careful review of the matter, we agree that Attorney Stern's license should be reinstated upon conditions to be discussed later. As to costs, we hold that, due to the unique nature of this case, Attorney Stern should be responsible for one-half of the Office of Lawyer Regulation's (OLR) $6,881.67 in costs, for a total of $3,440.84.
¶ 2. Attorney Stern was licensed to practice law…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against InglimoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- United States v. Leonard-AllenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. JenningsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against GralWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John J. BalistrieriWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thor TemplinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thor TemplinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Walter W. Stern, IIIWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021