Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Proceedings Against Gral

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 2010No. 2006AP1021-DPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review a referee's report recommending that Michael A. Gral's license to practice law in Wisconsin be reinstated. No party has appealed from the report and recommendation. Consequently, the court's review proceeds under SCR 22.33(3). 1

¶ 2. We adopt the referee's findings of fact and conclusions of law and conclude that Attorney Gral's license to practice law should be reinstated upon conditions to be discussed later. We further direct Attorney Gral to pay the costs of the reinstatement proceeding, which total $4,179.83 as of September 29, 2009.

¶ 3. Attorney Gral was admitted to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against GralWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. JenningsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael D. MandelmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John J. BalistrieriWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mandelman (In Re Mandelman)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. WoodardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API