In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Howard
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The principal issue is whether the accused should be suspended or disbarred for violations of various disciplinary rules in the Code of Professional Responsibility. Two members of the trial panel of the disciplinary board decided that the accused be “permanently disbarred,” and the third member, concurring in the findings of violations of the disciplinary rules, would have decided that the accused be suspended for three years.1 The decision of the trial panel that the accused be disbarred requires review by this court. ORS 9.536(2), BR 10.1. In this court the accused argues that we should…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re the Estate of ReddawayOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- In Re Lobb's WillOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of GaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Toomey v. MOORE ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PhelpsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GriffithOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GallagherOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HedgesOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.