Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hedges

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1992No. OSB 89-54; SC S37893PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an automatic and de novo review of a lawyer disciplinary proceeding. ORS 9.536(1); BR 10.1; BR 10.6. The Oregon State Bar (Bar) has charged the accused with violations of five sections of the Code of Professional Responsibility: DR 6-101(B), neglect of a legal matter; DR 1-102(A)(3), misrepresentation; DR 9-101(B)(3) and (4), failure to maintain complete records of client funds and failure to pay funds in a lawyer’s possession which the client is entitled to receive; and DR 1-103(0, failure to cooperate in an official investigation.

The trial panel found the accused guilty of all…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BootheOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of TrukositzOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WillerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DuggerOregon Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. In Re GildeaOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SousaOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BaloccaOregon Supreme Court · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API