Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Campbell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 2009No. OSB 06-14, 06-127; SC S055577PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary matter, the Bar charged the accused with ethical violations in two separate matters. In the first matter, the Bar charged that the accused violated conflict of interest rules in a bankruptcy case. The trial panel concluded (1) that the accused did not violate DR 5-101CA.X1) 1 when, although he had represented the debtor in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding, and was therefore an administrative creditor of the estate, he agreed to serve as special counsel to the estate when the bankruptcy was converted to a Chapter 7 proceeding; but (2) that the accused did violate…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re Heatron, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1980
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BanksOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PhelpsOregon Supreme Court · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pereira v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HostetterOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. In re MaurerOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Scott v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. In re Complaint as to the Conduct of GattiOregon Supreme Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API