Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to Conduct of Galton

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1980No. OSB 1332 SC 26691PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a disciplinary proceeding originating from an anonymous letter to the Oregon State Bar. The letter was as follows:

"6/23/76
"How can a lawyer (Herb Galton) represent both sides in a transaction that involves the give-away of corporate assets? Is that ethical?
"A concerned union member”

Following its investigation the Bar instituted this disciplinary proceeding in which the accused was originally charged with unethical conduct in seven specifics and with an eighth charge that accused’s course of conduct, in the aggregate, was such as to render him unfit to practice law. Upon motion of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sadler v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of RubenOregon Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MorrowOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChambersOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WeidnerOregon Supreme Court · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API