In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Gallagher
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged the accused by formal complaint with violating Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(3) (prohibiting conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation) (two counts); DR 1-103(0 (requiring cooperation with Bar investigation) (two counts); and DR 9-10KA) (requiring deposit and maintenance of client funds in trust account). In its first cause of complaint, the Bar alleged that the accused violated DR 1-102(A)(3) by attempting to accept a settlement offer made by opposing counsel when the accused knew that opposing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrandtOregon Supreme Court · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SkagenOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Glaze v. J.K. Williams, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
- In Re CarpenterOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re WorthOregon Supreme Court · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.