Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Gallagher

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 2001No. OSB 98-12; SC S47248PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged the accused by formal complaint with violating Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(3) (prohibiting conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation) (two counts); DR 1-103(0 (requiring cooperation with Bar investigation) (two counts); and DR 9-10KA) (requiring deposit and maintenance of client funds in trust account). In its first cause of complaint, the Bar alleged that the accused violated DR 1-102(A)(3) by attempting to accept a settlement offer made by opposing counsel when the accused knew that opposing…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrandtOregon Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SkagenOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Glaze v. J.K. Williams, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  4. In Re CarpenterOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In Re WorthOregon Supreme Court · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API