Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Griffith
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1987No. OSB 85-61; SC S33097PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Per curiam
The Oregon State Bar filed an amended complaint against C. Anderson Griffith accusing him of unethical conduct in 39 separate causes involving for the most part alleged dishonesty in business transactions and alleged conflicts of interest. The Trial Panel of the Disciplinary Board found Griffith guilty as charged in the 2nd, 27th, 28th, and 34th causes of complaint and not guilty of the balance of the causes. It “recommended” that Griffith “be permanently disbarred from the practice of law.”
We find that Griffith is guilty under the 2nd, 27th, 29th, 30th, 32nd, 33rd, 34th, 36th, 38th, and 39th…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re Interest of LVNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Trotter v. NelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re GriffithOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.