In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Holman
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The Oregon State Bar complains that the accused attorney, as trustee of the “Jackson Trust,” an express trust, in the approximately two and one-half year period from the late Fall of 1978 to the Summer of 1981, stole some $42,000 from the trust assets in violation of a disciplinary rule, DR 1-102(A)(4), which provides:
“A lawyer shall not: [e]ngage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation.”
The Bar further complains that the accused commingled those funds from the trust assets with his personal funds and used the commingled funds for his own benefit in violation of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cook v. MichaelOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- In Re the Discipline of RudeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Hyland v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- In re GreggOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- In Re Complaint of StoddOregon Supreme Court · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. GallantOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PhelpsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Matter of DoeDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1992
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MurdockOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.