Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Smith

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1992No. 91-152PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

URBIGKIT, Justice.

This appeal, in current course of events, presents the third lawsuit in what is now generally designed to be a legal malpractice action. Appellants, as minority shareholders, sued Smith, Stanfield and Scott— the attorneys who represented the majority shareholder and parent corporation after rights against a third party were resolved *187by a favorable cash settlement, and the shareholders could not then agree on a division of the settlement proceeds. That disagreement was litigated through appeal, Squaw Mountain Cattle Co. v. Bowen, 804 P.2d 1292 (Wyo.1991), with the minority…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. The Government of India and the Food Corporation of India v. Cook Industries, Inc. And Cook and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  3. Cordova v. GosarWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  4. EF Hutton & Company v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1969
  5. Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Meyer v. MulliganWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Bevan Ex Rel. Bevan v. FixWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Wallop Canyon Ranch, LLC v. GoodwynWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Killian v. Caza Drilling, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Sorensen v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API