Crimson Trace Corp. v. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
In this original proceeding in mandamus, relator Davis Wright Tremaine LLP (“DWT”) challenges a trial court order compelling production of certain materials that, in DWT’s view, are protected under the attorney-client privilege codified at OEC 503. The trial court issued the order in the context of a legal malpractice action against DWT by a former client. The materials that are the subject of the order are communications between DWT’s designated in-house counsel and the lawyers in the firm who had represented the former client, and concern how actual and potential conflicts between the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Riggs National Bank of Washington, D. C. v. ZimmerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Wyers v. American Medical Response Northwest, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Arrowood Indemnity Co. v. FaschingOregon Supreme Court · 2022
- Deep Photonics Corp. v. LaChapelleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- City of Portland v. BartlettOregon Supreme Court · 2022
- Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.