Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Leonard

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1989No. OSB 86-122; SC S35944PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

The accused is a lawyer charged with two instances of dishonesty under former DR 1-102(A)(4) (now renumbered DR 1-102(A)(3)) of the Code of Professional Responsibility), which provides:

“It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.”

A Trial Panel found the accused guilty of both charges, and imposed a public reprimand. Both the Oregon State Bar (the Bar) and the accused sought review in this court. We find the accused guilty on one of the charges only, but we impose a suspension from the practice of law for 35 days.

I.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GlassOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrandsnessOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WillerOregon Supreme Court · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WeidnerOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re Complaints as to the Conduct of WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrandtOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DavenportOregon Supreme Court · 2002

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API