Matter of Petrie
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HOLOHAN, Justice.
This matter comes to us on the objections of the respondent attorney to the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the Disciplinary Commission.
The Local Administrative Committee of the Arizona State Bar after hearing evidence had recommended that respondent be censured for representing clients with adverse interests in violation of Disciplinary Rule 5-105(A) and (B), and for failing to carry out a contract of employment in violation of Disciplinary Rule 7-101(A)(2). 1
Respondent filed objections to the Committee’s findings of fact, conclusions of law and recommendations.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of NevilleArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McGlothlenWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Alexander v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Arden v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Bohn v. CodyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. BennettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- In Re ShannonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re OckrassaArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Breuer-Harrison, Inc. v. CombeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.