Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Banks

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1978No. 1200; 1201; SC 25221PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a combined disciplinary proceeding brought by the Oregon State Bar against two of its members. The accuseds are partners in a large firm, the accused Thompson being in the firm’s business department, and the accused Banks being in its litigation department. The charges against both arise out of legal business transacted for United Medical Laboratories, a corporation (UML), its board of directors, its officers, the members of the family who owned the corporate stock, and a corporation competing with UML. As would be anticipated, the facts are complicated.

UML was engaged in operating a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. EF Hutton & Company v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1969
  2. Cannon v. US Acoustics CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
  3. Meehan v. HoppsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Seifert v. Dumatic Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. U.S. Industries, Inc. v. GoldmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. ABC Trans National Transport, Inc. v. Aeronautics Forwarders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. Liquilux Gas Corp. v. Humberto BerríosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1995
  3. Margulies Ex Rel. Margulies v. UpchurchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Lee v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API