Kaess v. Armstrong Cork Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
WAHL, Justice.
The heirs of Arthur Kaess brought a wrongful death action against manufacturers and sellers of asbestos-containing insulation, including Kaess’ employer, MacArthur Company. MacArthur moved for partial dismissal for failure to state a cause of action, or for partial summary judgment, citing the workers compensation exclusive remedy provision, Minn.Stat. § 176.031 (1984). The Dakota County District Court denied the motion and, pursuant to Minn.R. Civ.App.P. 103.03(h), 1 certified to the court of appeals a question concerning whether Minn.Stat. § 176.031 is a bar to the employee’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Farr v. Armstrong Rubber CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Boek v. Wong HingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Kaluza v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Hildebrandt v. Whirlpool Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by12 opinions
- Henning v. General Motors Assembly DivisionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- Egeland v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Gunderson v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Konken v. Oakland Farmers' Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Meintsma v. Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.