Legal Opinion
Breimhorst v. Beckman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 14, 1949No. Nos. 34,723, 34,727PublishedCited by 118 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Matson, Justice.
In a common-law action for damages for disfigurement, we have an appeal by defendant John Gr. Andrist from an order denying his blended motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial, and an appeal by plaintiff, Harriet E. Breimhorst, from an order denying her motion for a new trial as to defendant William Beckman.
At Jordan, Minnesota, on the morning of December 15, 1946, plaintiff, a part-time waitress, in the course of her employment, was injured in a restaurant operated by defendant Andrist on premises rented by him from defendant Beckman. The restaurant occupied a…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Matter of Jensen v. . Southern Pacific Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- Texas Workers' Compensation Commission v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Attorney General v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Firelock Inc. v. District Court in & for the 20th Judicial District of the State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Abraham v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Marriage of Holmberg v. HolmbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.