Legal Opinion

Egeland v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 10, 1987No. C8-86-1586PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

This appeal comes to us from a judgment of the Lake County District Court dismissing appellants Walter and Lilia Egeland’s personal injury suit against respondents State of Minnesota and its employee Keith Arthur Olsen. The district court dismissed the Egelands’ suit on the ground that Walter Egeland was, as a matter of law, a state employee, and thus the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers’ Compensation Act, Minn.Stat. § 176.031 (1986), prohibits the Egelands from suing the state in tort. The Egelands filed a notice of appeal with Court of Appeals raising three…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PurdyAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Darvell v. Paul A. Laurence Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. St. Paul Citizens for Human Rights v. City Council of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Kaess v. Armstrong Cork Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Olsen v. KlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Phelps v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  2. Payne v. Galen Hospital Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Henning v. General Motors Assembly DivisionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Brandt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Oelrich v. Schlagels, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API