Legal Opinion

Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Company

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 24, 1970No. 41970-3, 42008-11 and 42435-8PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

Plaintiffs, Duane and Ben Farr, Darrell Farr, Farr Plumbing and Heating Company, and Thomas Correll, recovered verdicts against defendants, The Armstrong Rubber Company and Elmer N. Olson Company, in these personal injury actions. In each action Armstrong appeals from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a. new trial and Olson appeals from the judgments entered. Armstrong also appeals from judgments granting Olson indemnity, and Olson seeks review of that part of those judgments which denied it recovery of reasonable…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  5. McCormack v. Hankscraft CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Hapka v. Paquin FarmsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Pullman Standard, Inc. v. Abex Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Superwood Corp. v. Siempelkamp Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API