Legal Opinion

Hildebrandt v. Whirlpool Corp.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 15, 1985No. CX-84-1603PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, Justice.

The Honorable Harry H. MacLaughlin, Judge of the United States District Court, District of Minnesota, certified the following question to this court pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 480.061, subd. 1 (1984):

QUESTION OF LAW CERTIFIED

Whether a complaint by several employees against their employer, which alleges that the employer concealed a known workplace hazard and thereby committed assault and battery and fraud and misrepresentation against the employees, falls within the intentional tort exception to the exclusive remedy provision of the Minnesota Workers’ Compen sation Act,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mandolidis v. Elkins Industries, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Johns-Manville Products Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Neal v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Handley v. Unarco Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Harasyn v. Normandy Metals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Karst v. FC Hayer Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Helf v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Kempa v. E.W. Coons Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Kaluza v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API