Legal Opinion
Kaluza v. Home Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 3, 1987No. C4-86-1844PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, Justice.
Donald and Glenola Kaluza filed this action in federal district court, alleging intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, misrepresentation and fraud, violation of Minn.Stat. § 176.82, abuse of process and fraud upon the courts, and violations of Minnesota’s Fair Claim Handling Practices Act, Minn.Stat. ch. 72A. They sought general, special, and punitive damages from Home Insurance Company (Home), the workers’ compensation carrier for Donald’s employer.
Home brought a motion to dismiss the Kaluzas’ action or to strike certain paragraphs of the Kaluzas’…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Coleman v. American Universal Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Duguay v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. v. HollandMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
- Robertson v. Travelers Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Gibson v. National Ben Franklin InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Nunn v. Noodles & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Boylan v. American Motorists Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- Hough v. Pacific Ins. Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- Karst v. FC Hayer Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.