Legal Opinion

Henning v. General Motors Assembly Division

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1988No. 86-1162PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLouis J. Ceci, J.

This appeal is before this court on certification by the court of appeals, pursuant to sec. (Rule) 809.61, Stats. The City of Janesville (City), involuntary defendant-appellant, appeals from an order of the trial court denying the City’s motion for summary judgment which was based upon the exclusive remedy provision of the Worker’s Compensation Act, sec. 102.03(2).

The plaintiff, Gerald F. Henning, was an employee of the City of Janesville when he was injured during the course of his employment as a sanitary equipment operator. More precisely, on June 18,1982, Gerald Henning was at a landfill…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Mulder v. Acme-Cleveland Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Bell v. Industrial Vangas, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Weber v. Armco, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. Kruse v. SchieveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. HesterIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Western Steamship Lines, Inc. v. San Pedro Peninsula HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Riccitelli v. BroekhuizenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Payne v. Galen Hospital Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Schachtner v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations, Equal Rights DivisionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API