Boek v. Wong Hing
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
The appeal is from a judgment awarding plaintiff damages for defendant’s assault and battery.
By his motion for a directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict defendant raised the question of law that plaintiff’s sole remedy for the assault and battery was under the workmen’s compensation act, since the relation between the two men was that of employer and employe who were both under the act, and the fracas arose out of the manner in which plaintiff did his work during the hours thereof on or adjacent to the premises where his work was. The jury could find, and evidently did find,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rasmussen v. George Benz & SonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Perry v. BeverageWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- State ex rel. Anseth v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Hinchuk v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Gile v. Yellow Cab Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
- Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Jett v. DunlapSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.