Legal Opinion
Meintsma v. Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 17, 2004No. A03-416, A03-425, A03-861PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
This case arises out of a “birthday spanking” given to appellant Jeremy Meintsma 1 by five co-employees with a two-by-four fashioned into a paddle at his place of employment, Loram Maintenance of Way, on May 1, 2001. Meintsma sued Loram and the co-employees individually, alleging claims of assault and battery, aiding and abetting assault and battery, re-spondeat superior, negligent hiring, negligent supervision, negligent retention, and constructive discharge, as well as a claim for punitive damages. According to Meintsma, the birthday spanking resulted in injuries to his…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- O'MALLEY v. Ulland Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- McGowan v. Our Savior's Lutheran ChurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Boek v. Wong HingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Foley v. Honeywell, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wensmann Realty, Inc. v. City of EaganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Radcliffe v. Securian Financial Group, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Javinsky v. Commissioner of AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Stuedemann v. NoseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.