Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Obert
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 6, 2004No. OSB 01-150, 01-151, 01-170; SC S50320PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged the accused lawyer, Mark G. Obert, with multiple violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility stemming from his conduct in matters involving three clients: Cooper, Crawford, and Williams. In the Cooper matter, the Bar charged the accused with violations of Disciplinary Rule (DR) 5-105(E) (representing multiple current clients whose interests conflict) and DR 6-101(B) (neglect of legal matter). In the Crawford matter, the Bar also charged the accused with a violation of DR 6-101(B), as well as a violation of DR…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KimmellOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Complaints as to the Conduct of WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SkagenOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ObertOregon Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re KnappenbergerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ReddenOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- In Matter of ConvisserNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.