Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Skagen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2006No. OSB 03-64; SC S52940PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged the accused with violating the following Disciplinary Rules (DR) of the Oregon Code of Professional Responsibility: DR 9-101(A) (requiring lawyer to maintain client funds in trust account and to identify account with phrase “Lawyer Trust Account”); DR 9-101(C)(3) (requiring lawyer to maintain complete records of client funds in possession of lawyer and to render appropriate accounts to client regarding funds); DR 9-101(D)(l) (requiring lawyer trust account to be interest-bearing); DR 1-102(A)(3) (prohibiting…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re ZieglerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1980
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GygiOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2003

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HartfieldOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Howard J. BlylerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
  4. In re McGrawOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CobbOregon Supreme Court · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API