Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Eadie
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 6, 2001No. OSB 96-80, 97-105, 97-109, 97-114; SC S47751PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Per curiam
In this lawyer discipline proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged the accused with statutory violations and multiple violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility in connection with his representation of several clients: Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(3) (dishonesty and misrepresentation); DR 1-102(A)(4) (conduct prejudicial to administration of justice); DR 6-101(A) (incompetence); DR 6-101(B) (neglect of client matter); DR 7-102(A)(5) (false statement during representation); DR 7-106(0(1) (alluding to inadmissible evidence); DR 7-106(0(7) (intentionally or habitually…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of DeversOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. Camacho-AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Gurski v. Rosenblum and Filan, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. RodveltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.