Legal Opinion
In Re Knappenberger
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 20, 2004No. OSB 01-9, 01-121, 01-122; SC S49996PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged Allan F. Knappenberger (the accused) with violating Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 5-101(A) (conflict of interest with lawyer’s self-interest) and DR 6-101(B) (neglect of legal matter) in the course of representing three clients: Mirra, Loitz, and Bridge. A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board concluded that the accused committed the alleged violations and imposed a one-year suspension (with nine months stayed pending satisfactory compliance with conditions described below) and a two-year…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Owens v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re KnappenbergerOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ReddenOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KnappenbergerOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re the Reciprocal Discipline of LopezOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SnyderOregon Supreme Court · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.