Legal Opinion
In Re Complaints as to the Conduct of Williams
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 29, 1992No. OSB 89-2; 89-30; OSB 90-91; 90-92; 90-93; SC S38051PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Per curiam
This opinion involves two separate disciplinary cases filed against the accused, James E. Williams. We have consolidated the two proceedings for this opinion.
A. THE FIRST PROCEEDING
In this disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar charged the accused with violations of DR 1-102(A)(3) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation), DR 1-102(A)(4)1 (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and DR 9-101(A)2 (failure to maintain client’s funds in identifiable trust account). The trial panel of the Oregon State Bar Disciplinary Board found the accused not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LeonardOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FullerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Scott v. FrancisOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HubertOregon Supreme Court · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- YOUNG v. STATION 27, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Streeks, Inc. v. Diamond Hill Farms, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MurdockOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FitzhenryOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DavenportOregon Supreme Court · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.