Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Dugger

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 2002No. OSB 98-52, 00-65; SC S48634PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged the accused with violating Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(3) (engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation); DR 1-102(A)(4) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to administration of justice); DR 5-101(A)(1) (continuing representation when professional judgment was or reasonably may have been affected by lawyer’s own financial, business, property, or personal interests); DR 5-101(B) (prohibiting lawyer from preparing instrument giving lawyer or person…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SkagenOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In Re CarpenterOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WorthOregon Supreme Court · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API