In Re Carpenter
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) alleged that the accused violated Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(3) (prohibiting dishonesty, fraud, deceit, and misrepresentation). The facts centered on a posting by the accused of a message on an Internet site in which he identified himself by the name of a teacher, who served as a local high school counselor and coach, and implied in that message that the teacher had engaged in sexual behavior with students. A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board concluded that the accused had not…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of StaufferOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LeonardOregon Supreme Court · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SkagenOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re the Reciprocal Discipline of WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 2012
- In re KlempOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- Discipline of RavnsborgSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.