In Re Complaint as to Conduct of Wittemyer
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this lawyer discipline proceeding, the Oregon State Bar charged the accused with violating Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 5-101(A) (accepting or continuing employment when the exercise of judgment on behalf of the client is or may be affected by business, property, or personal interests) (three counts); DR 5-104(A) (entering into a business transaction with a client in which the lawyer and client have differing interests); and DR 5-105(E) (representing multiple clients with conflicting interests). A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found that the accused…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of DeversOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WeidnerOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SchaffnerOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MurdockOregon Supreme Court · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrandtOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DavenportOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HostetterOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DuggerOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LawrenceOregon Supreme Court · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.