Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to Conduct of Wittemyer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1999No. OSB 95-190; SC S45376PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer discipline proceeding, the Oregon State Bar charged the accused with violating Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 5-101(A) (accepting or continuing employment when the exercise of judgment on behalf of the client is or may be affected by business, property, or personal interests) (three counts); DR 5-104(A) (entering into a business transaction with a client in which the lawyer and client have differing interests); and DR 5-105(E) (representing multiple clients with conflicting interests). A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found that the accused…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of DeversOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WeidnerOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SchaffnerOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MurdockOregon Supreme Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrandtOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DavenportOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HostetterOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DuggerOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LawrenceOregon Supreme Court · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API