In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Brandt
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this consolidated lawyer discipline proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged William D. Brandt and Mark E. Griffin (collectively, “the accused”) with violating four disciplinary rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility: Disciplinary Rule (DR) 5-101(A)(l) (prohibiting accepting or continuing employment when exercise of lawyer’s judgment will be or reasonably may be affected by lawyer’s own interest, except with consent of client after full disclosure); DR 1-102(A)(3) (prohibiting engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation); DR 1-103(C)…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BoivinOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of DeversOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- The Florida Bar v. St. LouisSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DavenportOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re LawrenceOregon Supreme Court · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.