Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Lawrence
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 13, 2001No. OSB 95-249, 97-123; SC S46876PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
In this lawyer discipline proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged the accused with violating various disciplinary rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility and with violating one statute. The trial panel found that the accused violated Disciplinary Rule (DR) 5~101(A)(1) (continuing employment without full disclosure when exercise of judgment on behalf of client is or may be affected by business, property, or personal interests), dismissed the other charges, and reprimanded him. The Bar and the accused both sought review in this court. ORS 9.536(1); Bar Rules of Procedure (BR)…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sansone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MeansOregon Supreme Court · 1956
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. O'TooleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FitzhenryOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HostetterOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re LawrenceOregon Supreme Court · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.