Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Wyllie

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 2001No. OSB 97-84, 98-35; SC S47249PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer discipline proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) filed four causes of complaint against the accused, alleging a total of eight violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rules (DRs), including DR 5-105(E) (current client conflict); DR 9-101(A) (failure to deposit client funds into trust account); DR 2-106(A) (charging or collecting illegal or excessive fee); DR 1-102(A)(3) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation); DR 2-110(A)(2) (improper withdrawal); DR 6-101(B) (neglect of legal matter); DR 7-101(A)(1) (intentionally failing…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. O'Kain v. LandressCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. State v. HaltomOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BaloccaOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KnappenbergerOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KnappenbergerOregon Supreme Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API