Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Fitzhenry
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 2007No. OSB 03-85; SC S53443PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Per curiam
In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged the accused with violating Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(3) (prohibiting dishonesty, fraud, deceit, and misrepresentation) of the Oregon Code of Professional Responsibility. A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board concluded that the accused had violated that rule as charged and that his misconduct warranted a suspension from the practice of law for 120 days. Pursuant to ORS 9.536(1) and Bar Rule of Procedure (BR) 10.1, the accused sought this court’s review of the trial panel’s decision.
We review a decision of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Arthur Young & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Complaints as to the Conduct of WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Pereira v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HostetterOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ObertOregon Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EllisOregon Supreme Court · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.