Legal Opinion
Industrial Development & Land Co. v. Goldschmidt
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 17, 1922No. Civ. No. 3516PublishedCited by 16 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Plaintiff on the first day of July, 1915, leased to defendants certain real property located within the city of Los Angeles. The lease term was five years at a monthly rental of $250. The purpose for which the defendants desired to use the property was to conduct thereon a winery and wholesale and retail liquor business. In January, 1920, the national prohibition law became effective, which made it unlawful for the defendants to conduct on the leased premises the business referred to. They tendered to the lessor unpaid rental accruing up to the sixteenth day of January, 1920, amounting to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hecht v. Acme Coal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1911
- Stratford, Inc. v. Seattle Brewing & Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Seattle Brewing & Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- Security Trust & Savings Bank v. ClaussenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Security Trust & Savings Bank v. ClaussenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lloyd v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Takahashi v. Pepper Tank & Contracting Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1942
- Colonial Operating Corp. v. Hannan Sales & Service, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1942
- Losson v. BlodgettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Baird v. Wendt Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.