Legal Opinion

Security Trust & Savings Bank v. Claussen

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 11, 1919No. Civ. No. 3073PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Frederick W. Houser, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

In this action plaintiff sought to recover rent of $150 per month, alleged to be due for the months of April to October, 1918, inclusive, under the terms of a written lease made by its assignor to defendant herein.

The court found that plaintiff was entitled to forty dollars per month for the period in question, and gave judgment accordingly, from which plaintiff appeals.

The lease, the execution, of which defendant admits, provided that the demised premises, situated in the city of Los Angeles, were to be “used for the purpose of conducting and carrying on the business pertaining to a general…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. McLarren v. SpaldingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
  3. Hyatt v. Grand Rapids Brewing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Industrial Development & Land Co. v. GoldschmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  2. Land Reclamation, Inc. v. Riverside CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. 57th Street Luce Corp. v. General Motors Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Baron Bros., Inc. v. National Bank of SD, Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Baron Bros., Inc. v. National Bank of SD, Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API