Legal Opinion

Hecht v. Acme Coal Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1911No. 640PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to the District Court, Sheridan County, Hon. Carroll H. Parmelee, Judge. The action was brought by the Acme Coal Company, as the assignee of a certain lease, to recover from the lessee and his guarantor certain rent alleged to be due under .and by virtue of the lease. The guaranty is set out in the opinion in No. 639, a case between the same parties.

Read the full summary

Error to the District Court, Sheridan County, Hon. Carroll H. Parmelee, Judge. The action was brought by the Acme Coal Company, as the assignee of a certain lease, to recover from the lessee and his guarantor certain rent alleged to be due under .and by virtue of the lease. The guaranty is set out in the opinion in No. 639, a case between the same parties. The lease was assigned by an instrument reading' as follows: “For good and valuable consideration, the undersigned hereby sell, assign, transfer and set over to Acme Coal Company,.a corporation, all our rights and privileges under and by…

1Opinion of the Court

Scott, Justice.

This action was commenced in the district court of Sheridan County by Acme Coal Company against Dan McCoy and John Plecht upon a covenant of a lease to recover the rent of a certain building and premises described in the lease for saloon purposes for the months of November, December, 1909, and January 1910. The lease was executed on September 12, 1908, by Darnall and Craig, a co-partnership, as lessors, to Dan McCoy, lessee. The term of the lease was five years and the lessee covenanted to pay one hundred dollars a month as rent therefor in advance on the first day of each and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Houston Ice & Brewing Co. v. KeenanTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  2. O'Byrne v. HenleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Goodrum Tobacco Co. v. Potts-Thompson Liquor Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Lawrence v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  5. Abadie v. BergesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Doherty v. Monroe Eckstein Brewing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. Industrial Development & Land Co. v. GoldschmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  3. Standard Brewing Co. v. WeilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  4. Stratford, Inc. v. Seattle Brewing & Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Hayton v. Seattle Brewing & Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API