Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Seattle Brewing & Malting Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for King county, C. H. Hanford, judge pro tempore, entered December 27, 1916, upon findings favorable to the defendant, in an action for rent.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
Action upon two leases to recover rent claimed to be due. Prior to the last day of December, 1915, the *13premises described in the leases were occupied for the sale of intoxicating liquors. On that day respondent vacated the premises, under its contention that initiative measure No. 3, in effect on January 1, 1916, made further sale of liquor upon the premises unlawful and that the leases thereby terminated. In its answer, in addition to the above plea, respondent pleaded an ordinance of the city of Seattle in effect on January 1, 1916, similar in terms to initiative measure No. 3 (Laws 1915,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Houston Ice & Brewing Co. v. KeenanTexas Supreme Court · 1905
- Greil Bros. v. MabsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Heart v. East Tennessee Brewing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1908
- Cowley v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Cordes v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fischler v. NicklinWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Doherty v. Monroe Eckstein Brewing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Industrial Development & Land Co. v. GoldschmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Colonial Operating Corp. v. Hannan Sales & Service, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1942
- Kaiser v. ZeiglerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.