Legal Opinion
Baird v. Wendt Enterprises, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 24, 1967No. Civ. 30105PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFleming, J.
The Baird syndicate, the seller, sought damages against Wendt, the buyer, for breach of a contract to purchase a leasehold interest in real property in Hawaii. Wendt counterclaimed for damages for breach of the same contract. The trial court found both parties in default under the contract and refused to award damages to either, a decision which both have appealed.
We affirm the judgment, although our view of the transaction differs somewhat from that of the trial court.
The facts: on June 10, 1960, Baird agreed to sell, and Wendt to buy, a 60-year leasehold on property at Waikiki, together…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vibert v. BergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Industrial Development & Land Co. v. GoldschmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- National Pavements Corp. v. Hutchinson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Collins Hotel Co. v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bright v. Bechtel Petroleum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Bright v. Bechtel Petroleum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Hermosa Beach Stop Oil Coalition v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Aiea Lani Corp. v. Hawaii Escrow & Title Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
- Northrop Corp. v. Triad Financial EstablishmentDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.