Legal Opinion

Security Trust & Savings Bank v. Claussen

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 11, 1919No. Civ. No. 3105PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. L. H. Valentine, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

In this action plaintiff sued for rent of $150 a month, alleged to have accrued under the terms of a written lease for the months of November and December, 1918, and January and February, 1919. As prayed for, the court gave judgment in favor of plaintiff for six hundred dollars, from which defendant appeals.

As shown by the complaint and answer, the facts presented, other than the months for which the recovery of rent is sought, are identical with those involved in same title, No. 3073 in this court, wherein an opinion was this day filed. As in that case, this action is based upon a lease, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baker v. Eilers Music Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Dyer v. ScalmaniniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Wiese v. San Francisco Musical SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Baker v. Eilers Music Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Williams v. HawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bewick v. MechamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Industrial Development & Land Co. v. GoldschmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  3. Nave v. TaugherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. County of Santa Clara v. EscobarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Coast Counties Real Estate & Investment Co. v. Monterey County Water WorksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API